Link alla sezioneLibraries Experience & Sentiment
Among React libraries and frameworks, Next.js and TanStack Query lead the way in terms of overall positivity.
Note that some items such as useState
and fetch
were also included in order to provide a baseline, even though they're not libraries themselves.
Group by:
Sort by:
Experience
- Used it: Respondents who have used an item.
- Heard of it: Respondents who have heard about an item, but haven't used it.
- Never heard of it: Respondents who have never heard about an item.
Sentiment
- Positive: Respondents who are interested in learning more about a technology; or are willing to use it again.
- Neutral: Responents who did not indicate any sentiment about a technology.
- Negative: Respondents who are not interested in learning more about a technology; or have used it and had a negative experience.
My 2023 Pick: React Server Components
Eleven years ago, React reimagined web development by challenging established practices. Now, React is doing this again with RSC.
P.S. Shout out to the Next.js team for pushing this new vision forward.
Alex Sidorenko
Link alla sezioneLibraries Retention vs Usage
Among libraries and frameworks, Next.js was the only item boasting both high retention and high usage. On the other hand, while even more respondents had used Create React App, a lot fewer were willing to keep using it going forward.
Questo grafico mostra il rapporto di fidelizzazione di ciascuna tecnologia rispetto al conteggio di utenti totale. Può essere suddiviso in quattro quadranti:
- VALUTAZIONE: basso utilizzo, alta ritenzione. Tecnologie da tenere d'occhio.
- ADOTTA: utilizzo elevato, ritenzione elevata. Tecnologie sicure da adottare.
- EVITARE: basso utilizzo, bassa ritenzione. Tecnologie che probabilmente è meglio evitare attualmente.
- ANALISI: utilizzo elevato, bassa ritenzione. Rivaluta queste tecnologie se le stai attualmente utilizzando.