セクションにリンクLibraries Experience & Sentiment
Among React libraries and frameworks, Next.js and TanStack Query lead the way in terms of overall positivity.
Note that some items such as useState and fetch were also included in order to provide a baseline, even though they're not libraries themselves.
Group by:
Sort by:
Experience
- Used it: Respondents who have used an item.
- Heard of it: Respondents who have heard about an item, but haven't used it.
- Never heard of it: Respondents who have never heard about an item.
Sentiment
- Positive: Respondents who are interested in learning more about a technology; or are willing to use it again.
- Neutral: Responents who did not indicate any sentiment about a technology.
- Negative: Respondents who are not interested in learning more about a technology; or have used it and had a negative experience.
My 2023 Pick: React Server Components
Eleven years ago, React reimagined web development by challenging established practices. Now, React is doing this again with RSC.
P.S. Shout out to the Next.js team for pushing this new vision forward.
Alex Sidorenko
セクションにリンクLibraries Retention vs Usage
Among libraries and frameworks, Next.js was the only item boasting both high retention and high usage. On the other hand, while even more respondents had used Create React App, a lot fewer were willing to keep using it going forward.
このチャートは技術ごとにその満足度（もしくは関心度）と総利用数でプロットしたものです。4つの領域は、次のように読み取れます。
ASSESS: 利用率は低いが、満足度が高い。チェックしておくとよさそうな技術。
ADOPT: 利用率も満足度も高い。使っても大丈夫な技術。
AVOID: 利用率も満足度も低い。いまは避けておいた方がよさそうな技術。
ANALYZE: 利用率は高いが、満足度は低い。現在使っているなら、見直すとよさそうな技術。
セクションにリンクおすすめのリソース
Introduction to Next.js 13+, v3
