Link către secțiuneLibraries Experience & Sentiment
Among React libraries and frameworks, Next.js and TanStack Query lead the way in terms of overall positivity.
Note that some items such as useState
and fetch
were also included in order to provide a baseline, even though they're not libraries themselves.
Group by:
Sort by:
Experience
- Used it: Respondents who have used an item.
- Heard of it: Respondents who have heard about an item, but haven't used it.
- Never heard of it: Respondents who have never heard about an item.
Sentiment
- Positive: Respondents who are interested in learning more about a technology; or are willing to use it again.
- Neutral: Responents who did not indicate any sentiment about a technology.
- Negative: Respondents who are not interested in learning more about a technology; or have used it and had a negative experience.
My 2023 Pick: React Server Components
Eleven years ago, React reimagined web development by challenging established practices. Now, React is doing this again with RSC.
P.S. Shout out to the Next.js team for pushing this new vision forward.
Alex Sidorenko
Link către secțiuneLibraries Retention vs Usage
Among libraries and frameworks, Next.js was the only item boasting both high retention and high usage. On the other hand, while even more respondents had used Create React App, a lot fewer were willing to keep using it going forward.
Acest grafic prezintă rata de retenție față de fiecare tehnologie raportată la numărul total al utilizatorilor. Poate fi împărțit în patru cadrane:
EVALUARE: Utilizare scăzută, rată ridicată de retenție. Tehnologii pe care merită să le urmărești.
ADOPTARE: Utilizare ridicată, rată ridicată de retenție. Tehnologii sigure pentru adopție.
EVITARE: Utilizare scăzută, rată scăzută de retenție. Tehnologii care trebuie evitate în acest moment.
ANALIZARE: Utilizare ridicată, rată scăzută de retenție. Dacă încă le folosești, reevaluează aceste tehnologii.