段落連結Libraries Experience & Sentiment
Among React libraries and frameworks, Next.js and TanStack Query lead the way in terms of overall positivity.
Note that some items such as useState and fetch were also included in order to provide a baseline, even though they're not libraries themselves.
Group by:
Sort by:
Experience
- Used it: Respondents who have used an item.
- Heard of it: Respondents who have heard about an item, but haven't used it.
- Never heard of it: Respondents who have never heard about an item.
Sentiment
- Positive: Respondents who are interested in learning more about a technology; or are willing to use it again.
- Neutral: Responents who did not indicate any sentiment about a technology.
- Negative: Respondents who are not interested in learning more about a technology; or have used it and had a negative experience.
My 2023 Pick: React Server Components
Eleven years ago, React reimagined web development by challenging established practices. Now, React is doing this again with RSC.
P.S. Shout out to the Next.js team for pushing this new vision forward.
Alex Sidorenko
段落連結Libraries Retention vs Usage
Among libraries and frameworks, Next.js was the only item boasting both high retention and high usage. On the other hand, while even more respondents had used Create React App, a lot fewer were willing to keep using it going forward.
此圖表根據每項技術的全部使用人數顯示滿意比例， 劃分成 4 個象限：
評估：低使用度、高滿意度。是值得關注的技術。
採用：高使用度、高滿意度。可以放心採用的技術。
迴避：低使用度、低滿意度。近期最好避免的技術。
分析：高使用度、低滿意度。如果正在使用這些技術，要進行重新評估。
段落連結推薦資源
Introduction to Next.js 13+, v3
